← Back to Platform

What I Am Fighting For

A Government That Listens, Shows Up, and Works Like It's 2026

Most people's experience of government isn't a policy, it's a phone call that goes unanswered, a form they can't figure out, a meeting they never heard about. If we want people to believe that a strong local government can work for them, the ward office itself has to prove it, every single day.

I've spent my career trying to make that possible. At Deloitte's Government and Public Services practice, I've stood shoulder to shoulder with state and local government leaders asking a simple question: what technology and processes have existed for consumers in the private sector for years, and why can't we apply them to something as basic as a Medicaid application? I've learned how to build teams, how to stretch budgets, and how to cut through bureaucracy. And I've come away with one conviction above all others: that local government, done right, is the most powerful force for change in our daily life.

That means three things in practice. It means a constituent services operation built with the same discipline and accountability as the best private-sector organizations, where every request is tracked, followed up on, and resolved. It means using emerging technology, including artificial intelligence, thoughtfully and transparently, as a tool to serve residents better, not to replace the human relationships that make a ward office actually work. And it means treating public money with the same laser focus I bring to client budgets at Deloitte, publishing what we spend, explaining why, and being willing to defend every dollar in public.

This ward deserves a government that shows up. Here's what that looks like:

Sources

  1. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, “How States Will Implement H.R. 1's Medicaid Policies,” May 26, 2026. cbpp.org
  2. California Health Care Foundation, “What is the H.R. 1 Work Requirement and How Will It Affect Californians?” June 2026 (noting 66% of coverage losses during COVID unwinding were procedural, not eligibility-based). chcf.org